Saavan’s family describe repeated severe reactions after being told restaurant meals were suitable, with wheezing, emergency adrenaline and hospital treatment.
Illustration, not a photograph of the people involved
Allergies can be fatal
Wheat in a sausage. A child in hospital.
Ralph, nine, needed hospital treatment after staff repeatedly reassured his mother that the sausages did not contain wheat. His family reported a serious allergic reaction.
Illustration, not a photograph of the people involved
Allergies can be fatal
A dairy-free wrap. A fatal reaction.
Celia Marsh died after a wrap containing milk protein. The coroner found that contamination risk information within the supply chain had not been passed on.
Food hypersensitivities include allergies, intolerances and coeliac disease. The reaction figures are self-reported survey results, not population counts or proof of business fault. The FSA survey covered England, Wales and Northern Ireland; the eating-out/takeaway adult base was 767. The prosecution review is historical, not an annual total.
When a reaction means hospital
5,013 admissions
to hospitals in England for food-related anaphylaxis and other adverse food reactions in 2022/23.
154% increase
compared with 1,971 admissions in 2002/03, as reported by the MHRA using provisional NHS England figures.
30,700 admissions
coded as food-triggered anaphylaxis across the UK in a separate national study covering 1998 to 2018.
Admissions are episodes, not necessarily different people. The England total includes other adverse food reactions, not only anaphylaxis. The UK study covers a historical period and excludes emergency-department visits without admission. These figures do not establish that incidents were caused by undeclared ingredients or business negligence.
Real people. Documented consequences.
Fatal reaction / coroner’s findings
Celia Marsh: milk in a wrap described as dairy-free
Celia died in 2017 after eating a Pret a Manger wrap. The coroner found milk contamination in a yoghurt ingredient and identified supply-chain risk information that had not reached customers.
Outcome: inquest findings and a prevention of future deaths report in 2022. This source does not establish a compensation award.
Lesson: check supplier evidence and pass on cross-contact risks.
Mia-Shay St Hilaire: a milkshake and an uncleaned blender
Twelve-year-old Mia-Shay died after a milkshake in 2023. Southwark Council reported failures involving visible allergen advice, contamination controls and an allergenic ingredient.
Outcome: the Pop Inn Café operator received an £18,000 fine and a 100-hour community order in January 2025. This was a criminal sentence, not a compensation payout.
Lesson: clear information must be backed by effective preparation controls.
Karak Chaii, Soho Road: egg despite an allergy warning
A customer disclosed an egg allergy but was served an egg-containing dish after being told it did not contain egg. Birmingham City Council recorded an allergic reaction and failures in information, procedures and training.
Outcome: £30,000 in fines and £500 compensation ordered in August 2024. The compensation order was part of the prosecution.
Lesson: an answer to an allergy question must match the actual recipe.
A 15-year-old suffered a severe reaction after a meal in 2018. She received adrenaline and hospital treatment despite repeated assurances about her nut allergy.
Outcome reported in 2019: £3,767 fine, £2,744 costs and £1,000 compensation ordered against Sonero Tynemouth Ltd. These are separate amounts, not one compensation award.
Lesson: never rely on reassurance without checking ingredients.
Cameron Wahid: dairy in a meal after staff were warned
Cameron died aged seven following a restaurant meal in Italy in 2015. His family’s solicitors reported that staff had been warned about his dairy allergy and had reassured them.
Outcome: Irwin Mitchell reported an undisclosed settlement in 2021. This was an overseas incident involving a British family; the report gives no payout amount.
Lesson: civil claims can follow serious harm as well as criminal proceedings.
Authorities can prosecute allergen failures. Outcomes can include fines, costs and, in serious cases, imprisonment. A fine is a penalty, not a payment to the customer.
Compensation
A court may order compensation during a prosecution. A separate civil claim can also seek damages. A settlement does not necessarily mean liability was admitted.
How many businesses pay out?
We have not identified a reliable UK-wide total for allergen-related compensation payouts. The published cases above show actual outcomes, not a typical award or a national claim rate.
For the menu-checking figure, frequently means always, almost always or very often. These findings describe customer behaviour, not measured results from using And It Has.
Where And It Has helps
Know what is in each dish
Organise recipes, sauces, garnishes and supplier ingredient information.
Make answers easy to find
Give customers accessible ingredient and allergen information through menus and location QR codes.
Keep information current
Support updates when recipes, suppliers or ingredients change.
Clear information supports better decisions. Accurate supplier data, trained staff and kitchen controls remain essential. We do not claim a measured reduction in lawsuits or reactions from using our service.
What your business still needs to do
Declare the 14 regulated allergens where present as ingredients. Customers can also react to other ingredients, so full ingredient transparency provides useful additional information.
For distance sales, provide allergen information before purchase and at delivery. Food prepacked for direct sale needs a full ingredient label with allergens emphasised. A QR code does not replace required labels or kitchen controls.